Urban design describes a range of approaches to making towns better places to live. They can come from active citizens or from one of many professions: landscape architects, artists, ecologists, transport planners, architects, economists, surveyors and so forth. There are academic courses in urban design but there is no agreed curriculum and no control by a professional body. This is as it should be - because there are so many ways in which cities can be improved.
Wikipedia explains that 'Urban design is the process of designing and shaping cities, towns and villages. Whereas architecture focuses on individual buildings, urban design address the larger scale of groups of buildings, of streets and public spaces, whole neighborhoods and districts, and entire cities, basically the shaping of masses and spaces (solids & voids) to make urban areas functional, attractive, and sustainable.'
The landscape architects' contribution to urban design comes from their special skill in composing the five elements of landform, water, vegetation, buildings and pathways. The skill is learned a the scale of garden-size spaces and remains important at the scale of villages, towns, cities, city regions and tracts of landscape. The plans of many of the world's most admired cities are based on ideas developed in gardens - and landscape urbanism is a modern name for this approach.
'Urban' is an adjective and 'town' is a noun. So you can't design an 'urban' but you can design a 'town'. The English word urban comes from the Latin word urbÄnus meaning 'characteristic of, a town or city, esp. as opposed to the countryside' so 'urban design' can be read, not very usefully, as 'making a town more like a town'. So we need to remember that the cities were places where one could expect civilised behaviour - unlike the rough behaviour of the countryside.
The below examples, from China and Canada, are of Modernist Urbanisation. The design method was to lay out a grid-ish network of roads, fill the spaces with buildings and put a few plants around the buildings. This is not a Landscape Architecture Approach to urban design - which uses a different design method: (1) start by designing a public realm as a useful, beautiful and sustainable landscape (2) create the landscape space by arranging landform, water and planting in relation to buildings, routeways.
Urban design by architects and civil engineers. Note how the different dwelling types are carefully placed beside each other, like keeping one drawer for socks and one for pants.
Urban design by civil engineers and architects, with tastefully formal and informaal road patterns.
- about 2 years by Tom 5 / 5
Re sustainable landscape design, here is a comment
Re scale, it is very interesting and there is much to be said but I do not see it as a unique aspect of landscape design.
Re time, I believe it is an intrinsic and fundamental aspect of landscape design. In relation to urban growth, it is not inevitable. The world has many deserted cities: see the Wiki list of Ghost towns and even Germany has towns which are shrinking.
Re urban density, see
about 2 years by Christoph 5 / 5Hi Tom,
your view on Urban Design raises the following questions:
How do you define sustainable in regards to landscape (architecture) and Urban Design?
What role are time and scale playing in Urban Design?
Most of the composition elements don't change much over time, except plants. But social aspects and economical principles might change considerably. It seems Urban Design is based endless growth (mega cities, giga citiesâ€). What is the most sustainable urban density? What is the most sustainable size of an urban zone?
The reviews and ratings originate in all cases from third parties. Gardenvisit is in no case responsible for the correctness or accuracy of the reviews. Reviews and similar information are not an expression of Gardenvisit's opinions.
Check out this website: Down-cs.su